Scott Et Ux. v. Lindgren
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
This action for damages resulting from a motor-car collision was tried by a judge without a jury. He found for Henry J. Scott in $1,556.46, reimbursement for sums expended as a result of injury to his wife and in repairing his car, and for Mrs. Scott $500 for personal injuries. Defendant appeals from the judgments entered accordingly. The statement of questions involved specifies but three points for review, — two re-' lating to damage, the third to evidence concerning the extent of Mrs. Scott’s injury.
The statement of claim specified many items of “work, material and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- King Et Al., Appellants, v. BrillhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Krumrine v. GrenobleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Koenig v. Quaker City Cab Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Smith, Jr. Et Ux. v. BlafkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Kittanning Borough v. Garretts Run Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EVANSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Cartmel v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Cockcroft v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Lynch v. Bornot, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Societa Palmolese Di Protezione E Beneficenza v. MaialeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.