Legal Opinion

Koenig v. Quaker City Cab Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1925No. Appeal 159PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This is an action to recover for personal injuries, alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff when the motor car in which he was riding came into collision with a cab of the defendant company. The plaintiff recovered a judgment in the court below and the defendant appeals. The only question raised by the assignments of error is whether the averment by plaintiff in his statement of claim of. the injuries which he sustained in the accident was sufficient to warrant the admission of evidence, at the trial, that two ribs on his left side had been fractured.

The plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King Et Al., Appellants, v. BrillhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Twinn v. NobleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Cohen v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Consolidated Dressed Beef Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Nark v. Horton Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Matthews v. SpiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Scott Et Ux. v. LindgrenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Lynch v. Bornot, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API