Cockcroft v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadteeld, J.,
This is an action in assumpsit brought by plaintiff, the beneficiary named in four policies of life insurance issued by the defendant company upon the life of her husband, to recover the sum of $1,758 by reason of provisions contained therein granting double indemnity in the event of the insured’s accidental death.
The case was first tried before the late Judge Ckane, sitting without a jury, and resulted in a finding for plaintiff. From the judgment entered on this finding, defendant appealed to this court, which, in an opinion by Brother Rhodes, reversed the judgment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TrefethenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Ickes v. IckesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Cockcroft v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Mastel v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Walters v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. GenteelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Sipowicz v. OlivieriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Societa Palmolese Di Protezione E Beneficenza v. MaialeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.