Legal Opinion

Smith, Jr. Et Ux. v. Blafkin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1928No. Appeals 334 and 335PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought their action in the court below to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by tbe wife, and for losses sustained by the husband, as the re'sult of a right-angle collision at the intersection of Righter’s Ferry and Clwyd Roads on November 23, 1926, between an automobile, owned by the husband and driven by his wife, and a Ford truck, belonging to Blafkin Brothers. By agreement of the parties the case was tried before a judge without a jury and resulted in findings in favor of the wife for $250 and of the husband for $239.33.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frank v. PleetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Wescott v. GeigerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Kiely v. RagaliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  4. Forrest v. BuchananSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. Hug v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. KeoghNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Clee v. Brinks, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Scott Et Ux. v. LindgrenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Newman v. ReinishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Loughery v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API