Legal Opinion
Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 25, 2022No. 3:17-cv-03638Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PEYMAN PAKDEL, et al., 10 Case No. 17-cv-03638-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 12 DENYING IN PART MOTION TO CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN DISMISS FIRST AMENDED 13 FRANCISCO, et al., COMPLAINT 14 Defendants. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Plaintiffs filed suit against the City and County of San Francisco (“the City”) to challenge 18 the enforcement of a city ordinance requiring them to offer a lifetime lease to a tenant as part of 19 the process for converting their tenancy in common into a condominium. After the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.