Legal Opinion
Knick v. Township of Scott
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 21, 2019No. 17-647PublishedCited by 794 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts
*2167The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment states that "private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation." In Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City , 473 U.S. 172, 105 S.Ct. 3108, 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985), we held that a property owner whose property has been taken by a local government has not suffered a violation of his Fifth Amendment rights-and thus cannot bring a federal takings claim in federal court-until a state court has denied his claim for just compensation under state law.
The Williamson County Court anticipated that…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by794 opinions
- Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Dorce v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Abigail Ladd v. Jack MarchbanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
789 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.