Northwest Medical Imaging, Inc. v. State, Department of Revenue
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
May Alaska tax a corporation that was administratively dissolved by its state of domicile but that continued to conduct business in Alaska? The corporation says no. First, it asserts that no court has subject matter jurisdiction to determine whether taxes may be assessed on a dissolved corporation. Because Alaska courts have subject matter jurisdiction to determine the taxability of corporate entities, we reject this jurisdictional challenge.
Second, the corporation argues that the State of Alaska may not tax a corporation that has been administratively…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Gilbert v. GladdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Owsichek v. State, Guide Licensing & Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Monzulla v. Voorhees Concrete CuttingAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Pister v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Barlow v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Hawkins v. AttatayukAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.