Trans-Pacific Trading Co. v. Patsy Frock & Romper Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
Wm I. Zidell, one of the defendants, appeals from a judgment entered against him on his default, and from an order denying his motion to set aside the default and judgment.
Respondent, the Trans-Paeifie Trading Company, commenced this action on December 1, 1920, alleging in its complaint that the Patsy Frock and Romper Company. and itself were duly organized corporations; that defendant Patsy Frock and Romper Company and appellant executed a written order directed to respondent, by which the defendants agreed to buy 330 bolts of Japanese cotton crepe for a total sum of $5,940; that on April…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Stearus v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Alpers v. SchamMelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Brown v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lynch v. BenciniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Williams v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- In Re SargenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Delmoe v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Kooper v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.