Legal Opinion

Trans-Pacific Trading Co. v. Patsy Frock & Romper Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1922No. L. A. No. 7105PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

Wm I. Zidell, one of the defendants, appeals from a judgment entered against him on his default, and from an order denying his motion to set aside the default and judgment.

Respondent, the Trans-Paeifie Trading Company, commenced this action on December 1, 1920, alleging in its complaint that the Patsy Frock and Romper Company. and itself were duly organized corporations; that defendant Patsy Frock and Romper Company and appellant executed a written order directed to respondent, by which the defendants agreed to buy 330 bolts of Japanese cotton crepe for a total sum of $5,940; that on April…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Stearus v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Alpers v. SchamMelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Brown v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lynch v. BenciniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Williams v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re SargenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. Delmoe v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Kooper v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API