Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Sargen

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1933No. Docket No. 1764PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

This proceeding in habeas corpus was instituted on behalf of Bernard Sargen, a prisoner in the state prison at San Quentin, under -commitment for felony from the Superior Court in and for Los Angeles County, it being contended as ground for discharge that said commitment was nullified by proceedings had in the trial court after the prisoner had been delivered into the custody of the warden of said state prison.

The following are the facts: Sargen was charged by information with having violated section 538 of the Penal Code. He was at all times represented by an attorney, and on August 8, 1932,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. People v. SchwarzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Matter of HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. BeasleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. VernonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. OrranteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. State v. WhiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API