Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. Works & Lee, Ezra Crossman, F. C. Bailey, and A. B. Young, for Appellant. Allen & Flint, Shirley C. Ward, Flint & Barker, Edwin A. Meserve, and Frank P. Flint, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order vacating a default judgment against defendant company. The complaint was filed April 28,1894, in which plaintiff sought certain relief from defendant company on a contract made part of the complaint; certain stockholders of the company were made defendants to recover from them the proportionate share of the amount sought to be recovered from the company. Summons was served on the company August 15, 1894, and on August 24, 1894, the company and certain of defendant stockholders appeared by demurrer to the complaint. The demurrer was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. MullanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Dorland v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by22 opinions
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Lynch v. BenciniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Farrar v. SteenberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Landwehr v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.