Legal Opinion

Reese & Co. v. Bates

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 18, 1897PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Norfolk county, rendered December 22, 1894, in an action of Debt, wherein the plaintiffs in error were the plaintiffs, and the defendant in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Reese & Co. instituted an action of debt in the Circuit Court of Norfolk county against Bates, claiming the sum of $1,918.17 as due them upon certain notes amounting to $1,739.20, and *323a balance by open account of $179.50. To this action the defendant pleaded nil debet and tendered two special pleas in the nature of set-off, to which the plaintiffs objected, but the court permitted the pleas to be filed, and its action in this respect constitutes the plaintiffs5 first assignment of error.. During the progress of the trial exceptions were taken by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goodenow v. TylerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  2. Mason v. ChappellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1860
  3. Pickert v. MarstonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Robert W. L. Rasin & Co. v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  5. Smith v. JusticeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Alfonso Linwood Carney v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  2. Johns v. JaycoxWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Oriental Lumber Co. v. Blades Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  4. Bowles v. RiceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  5. International Harvester Co. v. LawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API