Oriental Lumber Co. v. Blades Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Law and Chancery Court of the city of Norfolk, in ail action of assumpsit, wherein the plaintiff in error was the plaintiff, and the defendant in error was the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
The Oriental Lumber Company, a corporation, instituted its action of assumpsit against S. B. Blades and others, partners trading under the firm name of Blades Lumber Company, to recover damages for an alleged breach of a contract in writing, in which the plaintiff was the party of the second part, and the defendants parties of the first part, entered into July 1, 1901, and which is as follows, omitting the formal parts:. “Witnesseth, that whereas the Oriental Lumber Company has made and entered into a certain contract with the American *732Lumber Company of Baltimore, Maryland, set forth in a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Locke v. HomerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Hansbrough v. Neal, Featherston & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Mills v. Dow's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Kohler v. . MatlageNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Reese & Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PowellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Simms v. SullivanOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Arkla Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. West Virginia Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
- Smith v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Gilbert v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.