Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Rice

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 13, 1907PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Bichmond. Decree for defendants. Complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

This appeal is from a decree adverse to the plaintiffs in a suit to set aside a sale of standing timber, made by a special agent, W. D. Rice, to the appellee, E. J. Thomas, and after-wards assigned by Thomas to the appellees, Taliaferro & Co., to in join the buyers from cutting anld sawing timber upon plaintiffs’ premises, and for other relief.

By written authority Rice was empowered to sell, within thirty days from September 1, 1905, the timber on the plaintiffs’ farm for $1,100 cash, the plaintiffs agreeing to execute a proper deed to the purchaser, and to allow two years for its removal.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Halsey v. MorteiroSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Dyer v. DuffyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ferguson & Fries v. GoochSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  4. Hansbrough v. Neal, Featherston & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  5. Burks v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Westmoreland-Lg & E Partners v. Va. Elec.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  2. Hartzell Fan, Inc. v. Waco, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  3. Lacey v. CardwellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  4. Epes' Administrator v. HardawaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  5. Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. DollinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API