United States v. Gardner
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
This appeal challenges the effectiveness of the accused’s representation by his appointed counsel.
The accused was brought to trial before a special court-martial on three specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921 (Charge I), and one specification of failing to obey an order, in violation of Article 92, 10 USC § 892 (Charge II). He was represented by two officers who were appointed defense counsel and assistant defense counsel, respectively. They were not lawyers in the sense of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. HunterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. DupreeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. BestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. MimsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. WinchesterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
- United States v. DodgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. ColarussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. ChadwellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. CulpUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.