Legal Opinion

United States v. Winchester

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 6, 1961No. 14,073PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

This appeal brings up for review the legal effect of certain actions at the trial by individual military defense eounseh

Four charges of misconduct, cul*76minating in the larceny of rifles for sale in Tijuana, Mexico, were filed against the accused and Private Donald H. Weems.1 They were referred to a general court-martial for a common trial. The accused was represented by individual military counsel, and Weems appeared with a civilian lawyer. The accused entered a plea of guilty; Weems pleaded not guilty. The Government and Weems proceeded to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. FowleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. ShibleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  3. United States v. BestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. McFarlaneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. RadfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. RobertsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  5. United States v. JordanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API