Legal Opinion
Hartel v. Warren
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 21, 1936No. 30,657PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Devaney, Chief Justice.
Action by.the special administrator of the estate of Mae Elizabeth Hartel, deceased, for the recovery oP damages for her wrongful death.
The decedent received fatal injuries while riding as a guest passenger in an automobile owned by defendant C. Mary Warren and operated by her son, Ralph E. Warren, also a defendant. It is conceded that the automobile was a “family car.”
The pertinent facts are as follows: The defendant Ralph Warren and the decedent were very close friends and often went driving together. On the evening of August 29, 1933, the decedent and the defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wicker v. North States Construction Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Waggoner v. GummerumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Christensen v. PestoriousSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Wagenbauer v. SchwinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Wolter v. Armstrong Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fussner v. AndertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Gordon v. PappasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Ekdahl v. Minnesota Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Koski v. MuccilliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Kelling v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.