Fussner v. Andert
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This case is before us on appeal from an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The plaintiff father brought an action for the death of his 19-year-old daughter allegedly due to the wrongful act of defendant. The jury returned a verdict for $3,000, which plaintiff claims is inadequate. The verdict, which left general damages in the sum of $1,739 after payment of funeral expenses, resulted, according to plaintiff, from the charge to the jury which expressed “an antiquated and restricted concept of ‘pecuniary loss.’ ” We are asked to reexamine the term “pecuniary…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Wycko v. GnodtkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Verkennes v. CornieaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Amann v. FaidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- Stidam v. AshmoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Bullard v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Godfrey v. WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Sherlock v. Stillwater ClinicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.