Legal Opinion

Fussner v. Andert

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1961No. 38,223PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This case is before us on appeal from an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The plaintiff father brought an action for the death of his 19-year-old daughter allegedly due to the wrongful act of defendant. The jury returned a verdict for $3,000, which plaintiff claims is inadequate. The verdict, which left general damages in the sum of $1,739 after payment of funeral expenses, resulted, according to plaintiff, from the charge to the jury which expressed “an antiquated and restricted concept of ‘pecuniary loss.’ ” We are asked to reexamine the term “pecuniary…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Wycko v. GnodtkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Verkennes v. CornieaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Amann v. FaidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Stidam v. AshmoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bullard v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Godfrey v. WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sherlock v. Stillwater ClinicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API