Legal Opinion

Wolter v. Armstrong Telephone Exchange Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1922No. 22,930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Action for personal injuries in which plaintiff had a verdict and defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Defendant owns and operates a telephone line extending along a public highway in Martin county. At the place of the accident, a telephone wire was strung obliquely across the road from a pole on one side to a pole about 120 feet distant on the other side. There was evidence that this wire had been slack and sagging for some months, but not so as to interfere with travel. As plaintiff was *493driving along the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holt v. BroeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Keithley v. HettingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Wiles v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Manning v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Novotny v. BouleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Harris v. EggermontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Hartel v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API