United States v. Turk
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
Charges alleging appellant’s unauthorized absence from his ship and missing movement of the same ship, in violation of *278Articles 86 and 87, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886 and 887, respectively, were referred to a special court-martial. Trial defense counsel moved to dismiss the charges on the basis that appellant had been denied a speedy trial. R.C.M. 707(a), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984.1
The military judge made various findings of fact. Significantly, he found that on June 17, 1985, appellant was declared “an unauthorized…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. TurkU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. CarlisleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. LonghoferUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. GrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. McCallisterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. DiesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.