Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Longhofer

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 26, 1989No. 60,662; CM 449197PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

The accused was convicted of several offenses arising out of alleged misconduct in the performance of his classified duties in special operations. At trial, he moved for dismissal of all charges and specifications on the ground that his right to a speedy trial was denied. RCM 707(e), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, mandates this harsh and exclusive remedy for “[f]ailure to comply with this rule.”

Charges were preferred against the accused on May 9, 1985, and he was notified of the charges on May 13,1985. Under the provisions of RCM 707(a)(1), the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. CarlisleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. TrueUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. CarpenterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. ByardU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. CancholaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  5. United States v. DiesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API