Legal Opinion

United States v. Dies

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 30, 1996No. 95-5007; Crim. App. No. 94-1117PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Chief Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial at Naval Station Treasure Island, San Francisco, California, convicted the accused, pursuant to his conditional pleas, of wrongfully distributing lysergic acid diethylamide, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 912a. The judge sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement and forfeiture of $500 pay per month for 18 months, and reduction to E-1. The convening authority approved the sentence.

By agreement with the Government, the accused’s pleas were conditioned…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CarlisleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. LonghoferUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. TurkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. MarescaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. PowellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. LazauskasCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. AndersonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  4. United States v. ProctorUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  5. United States v. DooleyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API