Volz v. Clark
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, Justice.
Plaintiff filed an action in replevin to recover possession of a hay baler sold by him to the defendant W. J. Volz. Attached to the petition was a copy of a chattel mortgage and on the reverse side of the chattel mortgage was a warranty of the fitness of the machine by the J. I. Case Company. Defendant filed an answer and cross-petition alleging a breach of the warranty by plaintiff, and resulting damage. The J. I. Case Company was made a party defendant on the application of the plaintiff. This company then filed an answer setting up the written warranty attached to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baker v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Bauman v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Kinnard-Haines Co. v. DillinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. v. HawheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. YancySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Straight v. James Talcott, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Norton Buick Company v. EW Tune CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Morris Chevrolet, Inc. v. Pitzer Ex Rel. PitzerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Mouser v. Keystone RV CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Straight v. TalcottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964