Legal Opinion

Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. v. Hawhee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1940No. 29448PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.

Pursuant to a written contract a hardware company sold the defendant a combine, which is a threshing machine with a harvesting mechanism at the side. The defendant signed a note and chattel mortgage as payment and security. The note and chattel mortgage were assigned to the plaintiff, the manufacturer of the machine. This is an action to recover a money judgment on the note and to foreclose the chattel mortgage.

By cross-petition the defendant asserted a breach of implied warranty of fitness in the machine, and resultant damage to him, and sought cancellation of the note and mortgage, plus…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co. v. HockingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Lumbrazo v. WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Tharp v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. CullumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sterner Aero Ab and Various Underwriters at Lloyds v. Page Airmotive, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  2. Sanders v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Dewberry v. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Superior Distributing Corp. v. HargroveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  5. Straight v. James Talcott, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API