Legal Opinion
Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Yancy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 16, 1924No. 14538PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, C.
Plaintiff in error was plaintiff and defendant in error was defendant in the trial court and they will be referred to here as they were there.
Plaintiff brought suit- against defendant to recover on two promissory notes and to foreclose its mortgage in one oil pull tractor-type 16-30, No.. 15639, complete, with all parts and attachments, also one Guide for 16-30 oil pull, and one- set of extension angle irons, for 16-30, which notes and mortgage were given for the purchase of said property May 31, Í919. At the. time the notes and mortgage were given there evas an order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scott v. Vulcan Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Hart-Parr Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Moline Plow Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Moline Plow Co. v. HoovenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Updegrove v. Gould Balance Valve Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Volz v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Rohland v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Troendly v. J. I. Case Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. WelchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933