Legal Opinion

Bauman v. International Harvester Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 1942No. 30684PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Plaintiff, International Harvester Company, sued in replevin to recover from defendants, W. H. Bauman and Anna Bauman, a thresher upon which plaintiff held a chattel mortgage. Defendants by answer and cross-petition asked for damages for breach of a warranty of satisfactory performance by the Hagin Farm Equipment Company, from whom they purchased the thresher, and who they alleged was the agent of plaintiff. From a directed verdict and judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

Defendants make two contentions: (1) That the plaintiff failed to make proper proof of rendition and payment of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. SniderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Moline Plow Co. v. HoovenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Davis Oil Co. v. CloudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Fritts v. McKinneCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. B-Star, Inc. v. Polyone Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  4. Weathers v. FulgenziSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. LPCX CORP. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API