Legal Opinion

Kinnard-Haines Co. v. Dillingham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1918No. 9379PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by the Kinnard-Haines Company against D. j. Dillingham. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, O.

The company instituted this suit in the lower court to recover a judgment upon two notes which had been executed and delivered to it by Dillingham as a part of the purchase price of a tractor sold and delivered to him by it in December, 1912, and for the purpose of foreclosing a chattel mortgage executed to secure the payment of said notes, and also to recover a judgment upon an open account for goods sold and delivered by it to him. To the petition in this case the defendant filed an answer which consisted of a general denial, and the further defense that in April, 1912,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baker v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Western Silo Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. ByersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Brooks v. LeGrandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Johnson v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Clayton v. PaulSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API