McCornick v. Swem
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. T. D. Lewis, Judge. Action on promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtFeign, J.
Despondent, in his complaint, in substance, alleged: That on the 1st day of September, 1904, appellants, at Salt Late City, Utah, executed and delivered their certain promissory note for the sum of $116Y, payable in four months from said date, to the order of the Northern light Mining & Milling Company, a corporation, at McC'omick & Co.’s Bank, in Salt Lake City, with interest at 10 per cent, per annum. The note also contained the following provision: “In case ' this note is collected by an attorney, either with or without suit, we hereby agree to pay- dollars attorney fee.” It was further…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bonestell v. BowieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Starnes v. SchofieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Harvey v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- North Atchison Bank v. GaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Alden v. PryalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Farmers State Bank v. HaunWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
- Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Utah National Bank of Salt Lake City v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Jensen v. LichtensteinUtah Supreme Court · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.