Legal Opinion

Henderson Johnson v. Sugar Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1925No. 4197PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

This is an appeal by the Bankers’ Trust Company, a corporation, as garnishee, which company will hereinafter be called appellant. The plaintiffs, Henderson & Johnson, will be designated respondents. There were a large number of parties in addition to the Hooper Sugar Company, a corporation. The Hooper Sugar Company will hereinafter be styled the principal defendant. As the other parties defendant are not concerned in this appeal, no further reference will be made to them in this opinion.

The record is somewhat voluminous. We shall, however, refer to such portions only as we deem relevant to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Express Co. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Randall v. WayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. McCornick v. SwemUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Pincock v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Steltzer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. District Court of Eighth Jud. Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Luebben v. MetlenMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Wyoming Construction Company v. Western Casualty And Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Mercer v. ThorleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Poston v. DelfelderWyoming Supreme Court · 1928

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API