Bonestell v. Bowie
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
Appeal from a judgment and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.
This is an action on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of the same. The original complaint was filed February 24, 1896. The note sued on was dated February 11, 1892, and was due sixty days after date.
1. The first point urged on appeal is directed to the action of the court in overruling the demurrer to the third amended complaint. Three amended complaints were filed in the ease, and the first allegation of each of them, as well as of the original complaint, was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Savings Bank of San Diego v. Central Market Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Dellapiazza v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Welch v. AllingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Dingley v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Menzel v. PrimmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- State Bank v. Mutual Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Commerce Union Bank v. Burger-In-A-Pouch, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Bowden v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- College National Bank v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.