Legal Opinion

Blair v. Espeland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1950No. 35,199PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magnet, Justice.

In an action for contribution, defendant appeals from an order striking certain paragraphs of his answer.

On January 11, 1949, the automobiles of plaintiff and defendant collided in a Duluth, Minnesota, street intersection. For injuries received, three passengers in defendant’s car brought suit against plaintiff and his wife, which resulted in judgments totaling $4,354.95. The judgments were paid, and plaintiff brought this action seeking contribution from defendant for one-half the amount so paid to satisfy the judgments.

In his answer, defendant denied negligence and alleged…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hayward v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Newco Land Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  4. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Morgan v. BoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. OtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Jostens, Inc. v. Mission Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Lines v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API