Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Garrison

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided September 30, 1974PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

Plaintiffs have brought an action for damages alleging that the defendants improperly performed a certain sterilization operation upon the person of the plaintiff, Doris Mae Coleman. Plaintiffs ask for damages including, inter alia, support for their new child, by virtue of the fact that the plaintiff, Doris Mae Coleman, subsequently became pregnant and delivered another son to the Coleman family.

The defendant, Wilmington Medical Center, Inc., moved in this Court to dis miss ■ the plaintiffs’ complaint on the ground that plaintiffs do not have a recognizable cause of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Gleitman v. CosgroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  3. Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Henne v. BalickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
  5. Terrell v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Coleman v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  3. University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jones v. MalinowskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Beardsley v. WierdsmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API