Legal Opinion

Henne v. Balick

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 25, 1958No. 12, 1958PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bramhall, J.:

This appeal relates to an action for personal injuries in which plaintiff’s counsel in his closing argument to the jury was permitted (1) to present plaintiff’s claim for loss of earnings on a per diem basis without specific evidence to support it; and (2) to present, along with a blackboard demonstration thereof, plaintiff’s claim for damages for pain and suffering on a per diem basis.

Plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident on November 25, 1955. At the trial it was shown that plaintiff sustained an injury to his back, a disfiguremnt, an impairment of the sense of smell…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Goodhart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Ball v. T. J. Pardy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Connolly v. Pre-Mixed Concrete Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Herb v. HallowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Beard Research, Inc. v. KatesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2010
  2. Jardel Co., Inc. v. HughesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  3. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Kronenberg v. KatzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
  5. Coleman v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API