Legal Opinion

Beardsley v. Wierdsma

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1982No. 5662, 5672PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*289BROWN, Justice.

This case involves two separate actions which were consolidated for review. Appellants filed suit against the appellees seeking damages resulting from unsuccessful tubal ligations. There are several categories of appellants here.

Eighteen appellants had tubal ligations so that they would become sterile, but instead became pregnant. They were plaintiffs below. At the time of the suits eleven of these appellants had given birth to healthy, normal children; three of the appellants were pregnant; and four of the appellants had terminated their pregnancies.

The husbands of the female…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Turpin v. SortiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gleitman v. CosgroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Siemieniec v. Lutheran General HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Cockrum v. BaumgartnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API