Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Garrison

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 26, 1975PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice:

In this malpractice action plaintiffs, husband and wife and their five children, seek damages alleging improper performance of a sterilization operation (a bilateral tubal ligation) on the wife, after which she became pregnant and delivered a sixth child. They appeal from a summary judgment entered for defendants (the surgeon and the hospital where the operation was performed) by the Superior Court. Del.Super., 327 A.2d 757 (1974) , 1 While our analysis differs somewhat from that of the Trial Court, we reach the same result.

I

We first consider plaintiffs’ contention that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gleitman v. CosgroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  4. Henne v. BalickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
  5. Terrell v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API