Legal Opinion
State v. Pahl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 20, 1959No. 37,556PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court denying motion for a new trial.
This condemnation proceeding was instituted in Hennepin County for the purpose of widening Highway No. 100 in the village of Bloomington. Respondents Erwin and Irene Heller own property and buildings fronting on the south side of the highway. The particular building pertinent to this appeal was constructed in 1948-1949. (All of the dimensions given hereafter are to the nearest whole foot.) It is rec tangular, being 133 feet wide and 200 feet deep, with the exception of an offset 45 feet by 33…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kelly v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- State Roads Commission v. WarrinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Connor v. Township of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Wilson v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Smith v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Jones v. Iowa State Highway Commission Ex Rel. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- State, by Lord v. FrisbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.