Carroll v. Unicom AP Chemical Corp. (In Re MGL Corp.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DIANE WEISS SIGMUND, Bankruptcy Judge
Before the Court is the Motion of the defendants Unicom AP Chemical Corporation (“Unicom”) and Albert Petichinskiiy (“Petichinskiiy”) (together with Unicom, “Defendants”) for Protective Order and for Stay of Discovery (“Motion”) in connection with the above captioned adversary proceeding (the “Civil Case”). The Defendants contend that they are entitled to protection from discovery proceedings because they are the subject of a criminal investigation and absent the requested relief they are put to the unfair choice of maintaining their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In re Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Golden Quality Ice Cream Co. v. Deerfield Specialty Papers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- ePlus, Inc. v. Katz (In Re Metiom, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- In Re Blood Reagents Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Tabas v. Global Automotive Group, LLC (In re MMH Automotive Group, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2006
- Ho Wan KwokUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- In Re: 461 7th Avenue Market, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020