Legal Opinion
ePlus, Inc. v. Katz (In Re Metiom, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 15, 2004No. 18-14217PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND AMENDED ORDER
MARRERO, Judge.
ePlus, Inc. (“ePlus”), a non-party in the bankruptcy proceedings of Metiom, Inc. (“Metiom”), appealed an order by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Drain, U.S.B.J.) requiring it to submit to an examination pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004 (“Rule 2004”). 1 ePlus moved for a stay of the Bankruptcy Court’s order pending the appeal. Because the appeal had not yet been assigned to a judge at the time that ePlus filed its motion for a stay, that motion came before this Court as a miscellaneous…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Matter of WilcherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- In Re Enron Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In Re WilliamsBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit · 1998
- In Re DinubiloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- ACC Bondholder Group v. Adelphia Communications Corp. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Sabine Oil & Gas Corp. v. HPIP Gonzales Holdings, LLC (In re Sabine Oil & Gas Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In Re ToftUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In re Millennium Lab Holdings II, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2016
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.