Legal Opinion
In re Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 31, 1990No. Master File No. 88 Civ. 8154 (RPP)PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
The facts underlying this class action are fully set forth in this Court’s earlier opinion, In re Par Pharmaceutical Sec. Litig., 733 F.Supp. 668 (S.D.N.Y.1990). Defendants Ashok Patel, R.K. Patel and Dilip Shah now move for a limited stay of the proceedings and for an order staying discovery. The basis for defendants’ motions is that each is the target of an ongoing criminal investigation and, absent a stay, they will be forced to choose between waiving the Fifth Amendment privilege, risking self-incrimination, and invoking it,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kashi v. GratsosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- In Re Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Brock v. TolkowDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Donald Weil v. Edward A. Markowitz (Two Cases). Tmg Associates Custodial Committee v. Monetary Group Limited (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Transworld Mechanical, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Chao v. FlemingDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
- Sterling National Bank v. A-1 Hotels International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. Private Sanitation Industry Ass'n of Nassau/Suffolk, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.