Legal Opinion

Walker v. Fitzgerald

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1923No. 23,397PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Appeal from an order denying the motion of the defendant Bear-man Fruit Company for judgment or a new trial of an action to recover possession of a motor truck.

Plaintiff sold the truck to the defendants Fitzgerald and May, taking from them a chattel mortgage upon it, in which it was described as “One type S. Wilcox, one-ton truck.” The mortgage recited that the mortgagors resided in Minneapolis and that the truck was in their possession. Plaintiff held an owner’s certificate of title to a motor vehicle described in the certificate as follows: “Motor Number 3051, Make Wilcox, Model 1,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barrett v. MagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Tolbert v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Adamson v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Kelly-Duluth Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Munson v. BenselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Gripe v. SinorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. A. Y. McDonald Mfg. Co. v. ReadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Miller v. McCray Refrigerator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API