Barrett v. Magner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover possession of certain personal property or $355, its value. Defendant Daniel J. Molan alone answered. The case was tried before Charles L,. Smith, J., and a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying their motion for a new trial, plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
March 30, 1907, appellants sold to B. J. Magner, in consideration of $525, a team of horses and a set of harness. Magner paid $100 cash and executed a chattel mortgage upon the team and harness, and upon three other horses, two other sets of harness, and a wagon, as security for the deferred payments. The mortgage was duly filed in the office of the city clerk of Minneapolis April 2, 1907. The following May 22 respondent Molan purchased from Magner the team which had been sold to him by appellants, and this action was brought in replevin to recover possession of the team. Molan claimed to be…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wolfe v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Horton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Godair v. Ham National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Conkling v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Barrett v. FischSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
- Theisen v. Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Mankes v. FishmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Pennsylvania Trust Co. v. GhriestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.