Adamson v. Horton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, refusing a new trial after a trial by the court and judgment ordered for defendant. The action was to recover $40 for the conversion of personal property.
1Opinion of the Court
Gileillan, C. -J.
The plaintiff claims under a chattel mortgage, duly filed; the defendant, under a subsequent purchase from one of the mortgagors. The property, which by the terms of the mortgage was to be left, and which was left, in the possession of the mortgagors, was household furniture, and was described in the mortgage as such property would ordinarily be described, thus: “One dark wood *162chamber suit, (three pieces;) one red centre table,” etc.; “now in their [the mortgagors’] possession in the city of Minneapolis, in the county of Hennepin and state of Minnesota. ” It is claimed by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wells v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Bailey v. MerrittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
3Cited by10 opinions
- City National Bank v. Goodloe-McClelland Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Barrett v. MagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Alferitz v. IngallsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
- Adamson v. FaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Helgeson v. Farmers Co-Operative Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.