Legal Opinion
Gripe v. Sinor
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 5, 1966No. 40208PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
The suit out of which this appeal arose was one for replevin of a truck commenced by defendants in error, partners, hereinafter called plaintiffs, against Clifton D. Scott, Bill Mize and Bob Gripe, hereinafter referred to by their names. Scott never was served with summons. The trial court sustained Mize’s demurrer to the evidence. The First National Bank of Yale, Oklahoma, intervened and it and Gripe opposed plaintiffs in the trial court and do so here as hereinafter shown.
In their petition the plaintiffs alleged that on the 13th day of January, 1960, Scott and Mize were…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Brooks v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Blevins v. W. A. Graham Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Drum Standish Commission Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Grand Forks National Bank v. Minneapolis & Northern Elevator Co.Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nix v. Standing Committee on Judicial Performance of the Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Hayhurst v. HayhurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Hayhurst v. HayhurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Kroeger v. GoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Nix v. STANDING COM. ON JUD. PERFORM. OF OKL. BAR ASS'NSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966