Legal Opinion
Munson v. Bensel
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 7, 1927No. 25,542PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action of replevin. The court dismissed the action and the plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The controversy is over a 12,000-gallon gasolene tank. On August 3, 1920, one Flinn, the owner, gave Nicols, Dean & Gregg two notes aggregating $875.85 and a mortgage upon the tank securing them. The mortgage was properly filed. It recited that the mortgagor was “of the City of Montevideo, County of. Chippewa and State of Minnesota,” and the mortgaged property was stated to be “now in my possession and owned by me.” It was described as follows:
“1 Monarch Lathe 14 in.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Barrett v. MagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- State Bank v. Mutual Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Tolbert v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Miller v. McCartySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kenneally v. Standard Electronics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Village of Farmington v. ReisingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Hirleman v. NickelsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Carity Motors, Inc. v. EichtenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.