Hardison v. Davis
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Action upon a promissory note for the principal sum of eight hundred and thirty-two dollars, alleged to have been made and executed by James Mack to plaintiff on December 28, 1894. It is also alleged in the complaint “that on or about the twentieth day of June, 1895, the defendant Davis wrote his name upon the back of said note to give it credit, and delivered the same to plaintiff.” Judgment is sought against defendant only, Mack not being a party to the suit. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered against him and from an order denying a new trial.
The defendant admits that he…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ward v. WatermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ruhl v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Kreuzberger v. WingfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Nolan v. NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Yordi v. YordiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Wood v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Gardiner Solder Co. v. SupAlloy Corp., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.