Legal Opinion

Ward v. Waterman

California Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1890No. 12662PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

On the eleventh day of February, 1885, the plaintiff commenced a suit against the defendant Waterman for the recovery of the sum of $21,404.16, with interest, due from said defendant upon a promissory note, which suit was brought in the superior court in and for the city and county of San Francisco. At the time of commencing the action he caused a writ of attachment to be issued, directed to the sheriff of the county of Alameda, and under it, caused the sheriff to attach all the right, title, and interest of the said Waterman in and to certain lands situate in said county of Alameda, standing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lord v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Grattan v. WigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Hoag v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Wood v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Lestrade v. BarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Auerbach v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. American-Traders' Nat. Bank v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Lynch v. PattersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API