Legal Opinion

Gardiner Solder Co. v. SupAlloy Corp., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 1991No. B051331PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

—“For every wrong there is a remedy.” (Civ. Code, § 3523.) Here the remedy is restitution: “. . . restoration of anything to its rightful owner; the act of making good or giving equivalent for any loss, damage, or injury . . . .” (Black’s Law Diet. (5th ed. 1979) p. 1180, col. 2.)

Gardiner Solder Company (Gardiner) appeals from the judgment in favor of respondents, SupAlloy Corporation, Inc., et al., (SupAlloy). Gardiner contends it is entitled to restitution of over $50,000 worth of solder it delivered to SupAlloy. We agree.

Gardiner, an Illinois corporation, did business with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Peacock Hill Ass'n v. Peacock Lagoon Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Runyan v. Pacific Air Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. LiemsakulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Lucky Auto Supply v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Beaumont Investment, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Nelson v. Pearson Ford Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Hernandez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Timberline, Inc. v. JaisinghaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Craig v. City of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API