Legal Opinion
P.R. Burke Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 25, 2003No. Nos. 96-232C, 96-445CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
These consolidated cases concern contracts for improvements to sewage treatment facilities on the Marine Corps Base at Camp Pendleton, California. Before the Court is a motion by the government for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), respecting four of ten counts presented in No. 96-445C.1 The plaintiff, P.R. Burke Corporation (“Burke”), alleges that it performed additional work and incurred further expenses when the Department of the Navy (“Navy”) modified the construction to be performed under the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Modeer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Information Systems & Networks Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- California Oregon Broadcasting, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.