Legal Opinion

Livingston v. Diocese of Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1998No. 72137PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rocco, Judge.

The eight plaintiffs-appellants in this action, all of whom are adult women who allege they were sexually abused as children by a parish priest, appeal from the trial court opinion and order that granted the separate motions for summary judgment filed by defendant-appellee, the Diocese of Cleveland, thus terminating appellants’ action. The trial court determined all of appellants’ claims were time-barred.

Appellants argue material issues of fact remain concerning the following: (1) the applicability of the doctrine of equitable estoppel to appellee’s statute-of-limitations…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Norris v. Ohio Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Flowers v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Jackson v. Alert Fire & Safety Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sabouri v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Hardcastle v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  4. Torrance v. RomOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Widok v. Estate of WolfOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API