Legal Opinion

Flowers v. Walker

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1992No. 91-812PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.

This case presents the sole issue of whether Mrs. Flowers timely filed her medical malpractice action against Dr. Walker. For *548the reasons that follow we hold that the statute of limitations in R.C. 2305.11 bars her action.

Former R.C. 2305.11(A), as in effect at the time relevant to the events in this case,2 provided in part:

“ * * * [A]n action for malpractice against a physician * * * shall be brought within one year after the cause thereof accrued * * *.

“If a written notice, prior to the expiration of time contained in this division, is given to any person in a medical claim that an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Allenius v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hershberger v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Graham v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. McGee v. WeinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Zemcik v. LaPine Truck Sales & Equipment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Browning v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Phyllis Jaskey Jones v. Chemetron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Cundall v. U.S. BankOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Craggett v. Adell Insurance AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API