Legal Opinion
Elizabeth BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 22, 1984No. 81-2471PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff Elizabeth Brown commenced this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging, inter alia, that defendant Parker-Hannifin Corporation (Parker-Hannifin) discriminatorily discharged her from employment because of her…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Esther HAYDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PLEASANT, TEXAS, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Ofelia Randle v. City of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Ricardo Jalil v. Avdel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Perry v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.